Perhaps it is what a derby becomes when an individual is stranded in the desert with no, er, sanitizing tissue?Bitmap dixit:Sorry, what is a craphat?
It does. It cannot be used like this, though.Bitmap dixit:you appear to know what a craphat is
alter has no plural
Why not omnes? It's not strictly necessary, but I don't see anything wrong with it.Bitmap dixit:yes, and without omnes
ceteri by itself implies all the others already. Adding omnes would be pleonasticImber Ranae dixit:Why not omnes? It's not strictly necessary, but I don't see anything wrong with it.Bitmap dixit:yes, and without omnes
Nikolaos dixit:I don't sere how this can be translated into Latin - craphat is obviously exclusively English, with no connection to the military lingo of any other language. On top of that, there were no paratroopers in ancient days, and no word to refer to them.
I don't know if the meaning would be recognized by anyone in Latin.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
There's nothing wrong with pleonasm. Sallust uses it.Bitmap dixit:ceteri by itself implies all the others already. Adding omnes would be pleonastic