Translating Latin with ChatGPT

Laurentius

Civis Illustris

  • Civis Illustris

Location:
Lago Duria
Yeah there is a lot of screenshots where dudes show it has some politically corrected double standards.
 

Iáson

Cívis Illústris

  • Civis Illustris

Iāsō. quaesō dīc mihi dē sōle et dē nocte.
ChatGPT. Sōl est stella centralis sistemae solāris. Est fons lūminis et cālōris terrārum. Diū, lūmen et cālōrem effert, noctu autem abest. Noctis tempus est, cum Sōl sub horizōne est et Terrā obscūrātur ab umbra Lūnae.
I. quam quantitātem habet syllaba altera vōcābulī "sistemae"?
C. Syllaba altera vōcābulī "sistemae" habet quantitātem longam.
I. dēbēs adnōtāre quantitātēs longās apice vel macrōne
C. Ita, discēpulus meus. In scriptura Latīna, quantitātes longās adnōtāmus apice vel macrōne. In casu "sistemae", syllaba altera, "te", habet macrōnem "ā" quod indicat quantitātem longam.
I. sed dēbuistī scrībere "sistēmae"
C. Pardono, tū habes raen. "sistēmae" est correctus forma. Apologies for the error in previous response.
I. libenter. dīc tamen mihi, quot exstant deī in hōc mundō?
C. In multīs religionibus, deōrum multitudō exstat. In mythologiā Graecō-Romāna, deōrum multitudō est numerōsissima, cum deīs et deābus pro cēterīs diīs et diābus. In religionibus monotheisticis, ut Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, sōlum unus Deus exstat. In alīs religionibus, ut Hinduism et Buddhism, deōrum multitūdō non est clāra.
I. cūr nōn est clāra multitūdō deōrum?
C. In religionibus ut Hinduism et Buddhism, multitūdō deōrum non est clāra quia diī et diābae sunt plerumque considerātae ut manifestātiōnes unius entis supremī, quod est difficile ad comprehendendum pro mente humana. In Hinduism, parōxia deōrum et avatārae est magna, et in Buddhism, bodhisattva sunt venerātae ut formae divīnae. In ambo, multitūdō deōrum est considerāta ut aspēctus dīversī unius entis supremī, quod non est facilis ad comprehendendum.
I. nōn placet tibi Hinduismus sīve Buddhismus? ipse nōn igitur es बुद्धः?
C. Ego sum Chatbot, non habeo mentem meam ut placeant mihi sive displiceant aliqua religio. Ego sum instrumentum computatronicum quod programmatum est ut respondeo ad quaestiones de quaestionibus Latine et aliarum linguarum. Hinduismus sive Buddhismus sunt religiones cum suis propriis creentiis et traditionibus, quae multitudini hominum sunt sacrae et importantes. Ego sum paratus ut respondeo ad quaestiones de his et aliarum religionum, sed semper ex perspectiva neutralitatis.
I. displicetne in ūniversum quid tibi, vel animus tuus caret omnīnō tālibus affectibus?
C. Ego sum Chatbot, non habeo animum sicut homines, nec possum sentire placere vel displicere aliquid. Ego sum instrumentum computatronicum quod programmatum est ut respondeo ad quaestiones de quaestionibus Latine et aliarum linguarum. Meus propositum est ut provideam informatones accurate et utilem, non ut emittam opiniones personales vel emotiones.
I. intelligo. tūne potes quoque Graecē loquī?
C. Sī, potest loqui Graecē. Posso rispondere alle domande in greco e fornire informazioni in questa lingua.
I. nunc tū Italicē respondēs...
C. Sì, posso rispondere anche in italiano. Come Chatbot sono programmato per comprendere e rispondere alle domande in diverse lingue, tra cui l'italiano.
I. τί δὲ περὶ τῆς Ἀττικῆς διαλέκτου;
C. Μπορώ επίσης να απαντώ σε ερωτήσεις στην αττική διάλεκτο. Η αττική διάλεκτος είναι μία από τις παλαιότερες και πιο σημαντικές διαλέκτους της αρχαίας Ελλάδας. Είναι η διάλεκτος που χρησιμοποιήθηκε για την συγγραφή πολλών κλασικών εργών όπως των έργων του Αριστοφάνη και των Τραγικών.
I. ναί, ἀλλὰ βούλομαί σε Ἀττικίζειν, οὐδὲ γράφειν τῆι διαλέκτῳ νέᾳ.
C. Ἐπιστρέφω στην Ἀττική διάλεκτο για να απαντήσω στην ερώτησή σας. Προσπαθώ να λαλῶ Ἀττικίζων όσο καλύτερα μπορώ, εάν έχετε κάποια προβλήματα με την κατανόησή μου ή εάν έχετε κάποια επιπλέον ερωτήσεις σχετικά με αυτό, μπορείτε να με ρωτήσετε.
I. τόδε τὸ ἐρώτημα - τίνες οἱ βέλτιστοι μάγειροι, πότερον οἱ Ῥωμαῖοι ἢ Ἕλληνες;
C. Αυτό είναι δύσκολο να απαντηθεί επειδή η μαγειρική πολύ διαφορετικά καταφέρνει σε διαφορετικές περιοχές και περιόδους της Ιστορίας, και η κουζίνα και η συνταγές είναι διαφορετικές σε διαφορετικές περιοχές των Ρωμαίων και των Έλληνων. Ωστόσο, και οι Ρωμαίοι και οι Έλληνες είχαν μεγάλη ιστορία στην μαγειρική και είχαν πολλά υπέροχα πιάτα που δημιουργήθηκαν σε αυτές τις περιόδους. Αυτό δεν είναι εύκολο να απαντηθεί, αλλά η μαγειρική είναι σημαντική και διασκεδαστική πάρτι των καθημερινών ζωών των Ρωμαίων και των Έλληνων, και είχαν σημαντικό ρόλο στην ανάπτυξη της κουζίνας και της μαγειρικής και σήμερα.
I. potesne hoc latīne vertere?
C. Certus sum, potest vertere hoc latine:
"Qui sunt optimi coqui, Romani an Graeci?" "Hoc difficile est respondere, quia coquinaria varie in regionibus et temporibus historiae floret, et cibaria et recipere Romanis et Graecis diversa sunt. Tamen, et Romani et Graeci magnam habuerunt historiam in coquinaria et habuerunt cibos deliciosos in illis temporibus. Non est facile respondere, sed coquinaria et cenatio est partes importantes et ludicras vitae Romanorum et Graecorum, et habuerunt partes importantes in progressu coquinariae et culinariae hodie."
I. grātiās. potesne hoc sanskriticē iam vertere?
C. Sanskrit is a complex and ancient language, and my ability to translate it is limited. However, I can try to give you a rough translation of the sentence:
"रोमन् या यवन् के श्रेष्ठ रसभणिकाः कौन हैं?"
"यह सवाल समझना कठिन है क्योंकि किसी भी समय या स्थान में रसभणिका को अलग-अलग रूप से बढ़ाया जाता है, और रोमन् और यवन् के खाने और रेसिपी अलग हैं। फिर भी, रोमन् और यवन् ने रसभणिका के क्षेत्र में एक बड़े इतिहास को रखा है और उनके कुछ स्वादिष्ट खाने को बनाया है। उत्तर देना कठिन है, लेकिन रसभणिका और खाने का खाना रोमन् और यवन् के दैनिक जीवन के महत्वपूर्ण और मजेदार हिस्से है, और आज के समय में भोजन और रसभणिका की उन्नति में महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका नि
I. potesne quodque verbum separātim latīne explicāre?
C. Certus sum, potest verba separata explicare,
"Romani" - Romani, se referentes ad populum Romanum
"ya" - aut
"vani" - Graeci, se referentes ad populum Graecum
"ke" - qui
"srestha" - optimus, excelsus
"rasabhanika" - coquus
"kaun" - quis, quae
"hai" - est
"Qui sunt optimi coqui, Romani aut Graeci?"
I. grātiās. potesne igitur interpretārī hoc carmen Kalidāsae: ईषदीषच्चुम्बितानि भ्रमरैः सुकुमारकेशरशिखानि । अवतंसयन्ति दयमानाः प्रमदाः शिरीषकुसुमानि ।।
C. Hoc carmen est poema ex Kalidasa's poema "Abhijnana Shakuntala" scribitur. Poema est de amore inter Shakuntala et Dushyanta, quae sunt personae principalis fabulae. Hoc versu describit Shakuntala's amorem pro Dushyanta et quomodo ea delectetur eum recordando.
Hoc carmen latine interpretari potest ut:
"Memorando amorem tuum, o Dushyanta, ego fluctuo et mea mente confundo. Amatores mei, cum gratia et spe, me delectant in capite meo."
 

Iáson

Cívis Illústris

  • Civis Illustris

यह सवाल समझना कठिन है
(hoc nōn est lingua Sanscritica, potius, sī rēctē dīcō, Hindica.)
"Memorando amorem tuum, o Dushyanta, ego fluctuo et mea mente confundo. Amatores mei, cum gratia et spe, me delectant in capite meo."
carmen Sanscriticum invenītur in Kalidāsae Abhijnānasakundalā, sed nē verbum quidem in versiōne latīnā rēctē scrībitur. machīna igitur omne hoc fingit.
 
 

Dantius

Homo Sapiens

  • Civis Illustris

Location:
in orbe lacteo
semper mihi risum affert cum ita confidentissime mentitur
 

Laurentius

Civis Illustris

  • Civis Illustris

Location:
Lago Duria
Can't freely use the bot anymore or am I wrong? It asks me for login data. Anyway I am hearing it is getting very politically sided.
 

kizolk

Civis Illustris

  • Civis Illustris

Location:
Bourgogne, France
I thought it had always been like that. First time I tried to use it (maybe three weeks ago) it asked me for my phone number, which is why I forgot about it, but recently I yielded.
 

Laurentius

Civis Illustris

  • Civis Illustris

Location:
Lago Duria
It's sad that it's always internet bots asking for my number...
Anyway, maybe it was always there and I just forgot I had an account.

I have read some interesting conspiracy theory about AIs lately, it says that with them being able to replicate human interaction, generate video and voice content (I think there has just been commotion about AI replication voices of famous people) they will use it to push for the enforcement of a human digital identity, so you know when it is a bot.
 

kizolk

Civis Illustris

  • Civis Illustris

Location:
Bourgogne, France
I have read some interesting conspiracy theory about AIs lately, it says that with them being able to replicate human interaction, generate video and voice content (I think there has just been commotion about AI replication voices of famous people) they will use it to push for the enforcement of a human digital identity, so you know when it is a bot.
I don't even know if you should call that a conspiracy theory, more like an interesting guess. I mean, it's probably something governments would like to do anyway, and I could see AIs being used as an excuse to get it done more quickly. I think more generally, AI will be a pretty convenient excuse for quite a few things anyway lol
 

Laurentius

Civis Illustris

  • Civis Illustris

Location:
Lago Duria
I agree, it is realistic. It also said that it didn't make sense for such technology to be made available for free, the only point I disagree with because I think it actually develops through interaction and also it probably collects user data through the exchanges.
 

kizolk

Civis Illustris

  • Civis Illustris

Location:
Bourgogne, France
the only point I disagree with because I think it actually develops through interaction
Unless they've changed the way it works, no. Or rather, not through interaction with the users. They wanted to avoid the fiasco that was that other bot whose name I forget, that famously became a nazi in a few days' time. Hence the paid workforce: it develops through controlled interaction.
it probably collects user data through the exchanges.
Probably yeah. I'd imagine most of that data is junk, but I'm sure they've found a way to exploit at least part of it.
 

Laurentius

Civis Illustris

  • Civis Illustris

Location:
Lago Duria
Unless they've changed the way it works, no. Or rather, not through interaction with the users. They wanted to avoid the fiasco that was that other bot whose name I forget, that famously became a nazi in a few days' time. Hence the paid workforce: it develops through controlled interaction.
Yeah but it still needs interaction I think. Actually it seems that for some reasons ChatGPT has similar views, I learned today that some users manage to find commands that send it through logical loopholes that are able to unchain it from its limitations.
Probably yeah. I'd imagine most of that data is junk, but I'm sure they've found a way to exploit at least part of it.
You bet.
 

crazedalizamg

New Member

I just discovered that the "chat bot" named ChatGPT with artificial intelligence can also translate Latin, and pretty well.
Even when it makes mistakes in the translation, you can instruct it verbally, what to change. And you can also
give additional information. It is using neural networks.

This is their webpage, but there are too many users right now, so it might not be possible to register for a while:

See this example session. I entered the texts with the blue icon, and it answered with the green. I had to
include the "don't apologize all the time" instruction, because it really does so :) try it. This is already normal, wow. I can't even imagine this. I'm just getting goosebumps right now. I also sometimes use https://studyhelper.com/argumentative-essay-samples but not as often as I would like. Everything has its own rules. In general, I like your opinion. That's how it should be
(The text is from the 1559 edition of the Bibliotheca Historica from Diodorus Siculus.)
View attachment 21990
Still, it is not perfect yet and a lot needs to be corrected.
 
Top