Yeah there is a lot of screenshots where dudes show it has some politically corrected double standards.
(hoc nōn est lingua Sanscritica, potius, sī rēctē dīcō, Hindica.)यह सवाल समझना कठिन है
carmen Sanscriticum invenītur in Kalidāsae Abhijnānasakundalā, sed nē verbum quidem in versiōne latīnā rēctē scrībitur. machīna igitur omne hoc fingit."Memorando amorem tuum, o Dushyanta, ego fluctuo et mea mente confundo. Amatores mei, cum gratia et spe, me delectant in capite meo."
I don't even know if you should call that a conspiracy theory, more like an interesting guess. I mean, it's probably something governments would like to do anyway, and I could see AIs being used as an excuse to get it done more quickly. I think more generally, AI will be a pretty convenient excuse for quite a few things anyway lolI have read some interesting conspiracy theory about AIs lately, it says that with them being able to replicate human interaction, generate video and voice content (I think there has just been commotion about AI replication voices of famous people) they will use it to push for the enforcement of a human digital identity, so you know when it is a bot.
Unless they've changed the way it works, no. Or rather, not through interaction with the users. They wanted to avoid the fiasco that was that other bot whose name I forget, that famously became a nazi in a few days' time. Hence the paid workforce: it develops through controlled interaction.the only point I disagree with because I think it actually develops through interaction
Probably yeah. I'd imagine most of that data is junk, but I'm sure they've found a way to exploit at least part of it.it probably collects user data through the exchanges.
Yeah but it still needs interaction I think. Actually it seems that for some reasons ChatGPT has similar views, I learned today that some users manage to find commands that send it through logical loopholes that are able to unchain it from its limitations.Unless they've changed the way it works, no. Or rather, not through interaction with the users. They wanted to avoid the fiasco that was that other bot whose name I forget, that famously became a nazi in a few days' time. Hence the paid workforce: it develops through controlled interaction.
You bet.Probably yeah. I'd imagine most of that data is junk, but I'm sure they've found a way to exploit at least part of it.
Still, it is not perfect yet and a lot needs to be corrected.I just discovered that the "chat bot" named ChatGPT with artificial intelligence can also translate Latin, and pretty well.
Even when it makes mistakes in the translation, you can instruct it verbally, what to change. And you can also
give additional information. It is using neural networks.
This is their webpage, but there are too many users right now, so it might not be possible to register for a while:
See this example session. I entered the texts with the blue icon, and it answered with the green. I had to
include the "don't apologize all the time" instruction, because it really does so try it. This is already normal, wow. I can't even imagine this. I'm just getting goosebumps right now. I also sometimes use https://studyhelper.com/argumentative-essay-samples but not as often as I would like. Everything has its own rules. In general, I like your opinion. That's how it should be
(The text is from the 1559 edition of the Bibliotheca Historica from Diodorus Siculus.)
View attachment 21990