One of the things that I have found troubling in using the nineteenth-century British Classical Dictionaries, such as are represented by both of the "two L&S's" (Lewis & Short for Latin and Liddell & Scott for Greek) are the ubiquitous use of abbreviations to be found therein. In this instance, I am wondering what is being abbreviated where Liddell & Scott use "codd.". The text from L&S reads as follows:
...the forms ᾤμοι and ὤμοι are freq. found in codd., as of S.Tr.l.c.,Aj. 980, OC202 (lyr.), etc.; ὤμοι is acknowledged by A.D.Adv.126.27. (οἴμοι may become οἴμ᾽ by elision in Trag. and Com. before “ὡς, οἴμ᾽ ὡς ἔοικας ὀρθὰ μαρτυρεῖν” S.Aj.354, cf. Ant.320,1270, Ar.ll.cc., Cratin. 183 : freq. written οἴμμοι in codd. of LXX.）
Can anybody give me the reference of this?
...the forms ᾤμοι and ὤμοι are freq. found in codd., as of S.Tr.l.c.,Aj. 980, OC202 (lyr.), etc.; ὤμοι is acknowledged by A.D.Adv.126.27. (οἴμοι may become οἴμ᾽ by elision in Trag. and Com. before “ὡς, οἴμ᾽ ὡς ἔοικας ὀρθὰ μαρτυρεῖν” S.Aj.354, cf. Ant.320,1270, Ar.ll.cc., Cratin. 183 : freq. written οἴμμοι in codd. of LXX.）
Can anybody give me the reference of this?
