Ad Fam VI.9

[Matthaeus]

Cum A. Caecina tanta mihi familiaritas consuetudoque semper fuit, ut nulla maior esse possit;

Again, prolly a dumb question, but I gotta know: is this in accordance with the consecutio temporum? My thinking is that such an intimacy and familiarity always was to such a degree, that no greater one can be conceived (still), hence the present.

 

[Pacifica]

Yes. That kind of thing is normal in result clauses. The consecutio temporum isn't limited in the same way there as in purpose clauses or indirect questions or commands etc.